Unifor Embracing the Ontario NDP?
At
last year’s Ontario Federation of Labour Convention Unifor found itself at odds
with almost all the other unions present in not favouring unequivocal support
of the New Democratic Party (NDP). Yet,
barely more than half a year later, Unifor finds itself effectively in line
with those other unions in Ontario because its friends leading Ontario’s
governing Liberal Party are tanking in the polls just three weeks before the June
7 provincial election. Unifor is consequently
being forced to come to terms with the fact that presently the Ontario NDP
alone can stop the election of a majority government in Ontario led by Tory
leader Doug Ford.
That said a meaningful
embrace of the Ontario NDP by Unifor would, in any case, effectively require
that a lot of recent history be flushed down an Orwellian memory hole. Indeed, there is nearly 20 years of this
history starting with the CAW’s initial embrace of strategic voting at the end
of the 1990s.
Some of this history would
be very hard to forget such as when CAW President Buzz Hargrove gave a beaming Liberal
Prime Minister Paul Martin a CAW jacket in front of loudly applauding delegates
to a CAW Council meeting. Less well
remembered was the time shortly afterwards when Buzz Hargrove introduced his good
friend and then Ontario Liberal Premier Dalton McGuinty to another loudly
cheering crowd at a CAW Council meeting in Port Elgin. On that occasion Hargrove declared that Dalton
McGunity was “doing a great job of giving good government to the people of
Ontario.” Much less well remembered was how
the next CAW President Ken Lewenza openly supported right-wing Liberal Sandra
Pupatelo in her unsuccessful campaign to succeed Dalton McGunity as Ontario
Premier.
During that long, sordid
history of embracing strategic voting and leaders and would be leaders of the
Liberal Party the union’s relationship with the New Democratic Party, which had
once seemed unbreakable, was strained at best and hostile at worst. Relations with unions which remained
steadfastly loyal to the NDP were similarly problematic largely owing to the
warming relationship between the CAW and then Unifor with the Liberal Party.
What Now?
The question immediately
posed by the situation Unifor now faces in Ontario is whether these
inconvenient truths about the past two decades can or will disappear down an
Orwellian memory hole, particularly within Unifor, and be conveniently forgotten
as if they had never existed? The answer
to that question is almost certainly no.
The legacy of this history is
certain to endure because this alignment with the NDP is limited to Ontario, momentary
and specific to a situation which will cease to exist after the provincial election
on June 7. The hard truth of the matter
is that although Unifor is ditching its Liberal friends in Ontario it is not
about to ditch the Liberal Party elsewhere let alone renew the type of close relationship
it had with the NDP before the late 1990s.
This is principally because the ongoing love affair between the national
leadership of Unifor and the national leadership of the Liberal Party is evidently
not being affected by the current, unique political moment in Ontario
Faced with a politically
weak, almost marginalized NDP federally together with the prospect of a 2019 federal
contest for power between Justin Trudeau’s Liberals and Andrew Scheer`s Tories Unifor
is consequently certain to shun the federal NDP just as Unifor shunned the
Ontario NDP until just weeks ago. The
politics of convenience will trump focused political consistency. Likewise, nary a thought will be given to abandoned
ideas about fundamentally changing society that were implicit in the forgotten
CAW commitment to what it referred to as social movement unionism and which
were never seriously promoted by the union within the NDP.
That mask is not just
off. It has been cynically discarded. Opportunism prevails. Unifor’s
objective now is not to fundamentally change society. Its objective is to be embedded in the
corridors of power alongside the representatives of Capital as a “stakeholder``,
as it has been in the current, doomed NAFTA negotiations. That objective was first clearly set out when
Unifor was founded. Achieving it remains
the order of the day.
Analyzing, exposing and
challenging the agenda accompanying that objective will be a monumental
task. But analyzing, exposing and
challenging it at every turn is imperative and must be consciously carried out as
part of a much larger effort to forge a fighting labour movement in this
country.
No comments:
Post a Comment